https://doi.org/10.32067/GIE.2021.35.02.60

Dentinal tubule penetration of bioceramic-based versus epoxy resin-based root canal sealers: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Vol. 36 No. 2 (2022)
Submitted: 3 February 2022
Accepted: 26 May 2022
Published: 1 July 2022
biomaterial, calcium silicate, endodontics, confocal laser scanning microscopy, scanning electron microscopy
Abstract Views: 2792
PDF: 922
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

Galvin Sim Siang Lin
gaelvylin@yahoo.com
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3996-5470
Department of Dental Materials, Faculty of Dentistry, Asian Institute of Medicine, Science and Technology (AIMST) University, 08100, Bedong, Kedah, Malaysia.
Daryl Zhun Kit Chan
Department of Dental Materials, Faculty of Dentistry, Asian Institute of Medicine, Science and Technology (AIMST) University, 08100, Bedong, Kedah, Malaysia.
Jia Zheng Leong
Petaling Dental Clinic, Ministry of Health Malaysia, 71600, Kuala Klawang, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia.
Ing Zheng Kan
Bukit Minyak Dental Clinic, Ministry of Health Malaysia, 14000, Bukit Mertajam, Penang, Malaysia.
Wong Mun Xuan
Pertang Dental Clinic, Ministry of Health Malaysia, 72300, Jelebu, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia.
Vincent Tee
Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medical Sciences, University Sains Malaysia, Health Campus, 16150, Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia.

An ideal endodontic treatment involves filling the root canal system with a sealer that penetrates the dentinal tubules and remains intact. Hence, this systematic review aimed to appraise and analyse the dentinal tubule penetration of bioceramic-based and epoxy resin-based root canal sealers. 

Articles published between January 1990 and March 2022 were searched in seven online databases (Google Scholar, PubMed, Web of Science – Core collection, Scopus, Cochrane Library, EBSCO, and Open Grey). Only in-vitro studies evaluating dentinal tubule penetration of bioceramic-based and epoxy resin-based sealers were selected. The OHAT risk of bias (RoB) tool was employed to analyse the RoB of each article. A two-arm meta-analysis based on the DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model was used to assess the standardised weighted mean differences in dentinal tubule penetration for both sealer types. 

Although bioceramic-based root canal sealers exhibit inferior dentinal tubule penetration than epoxy resin-based sealers, future well-designed studies with standardised evaluation tools and a more control of confounding variables should be conducted.

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

How to Cite

Lin, G. S. S., Chan, D. Z. K., Leong, J. Z., Kan, I. Z., Xuan, W. M., & Tee, V. (2022). Dentinal tubule penetration of bioceramic-based versus epoxy resin-based root canal sealers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Giornale Italiano Di Endodonzia, 36(2). https://doi.org/10.32067/GIE.2021.35.02.60
Copyright (c) 2022 Galvin Sim Siang Lin, Daryl Zhun Kit Chan, Jia Zheng Leong, Ing Zheng Kan, Wong Mun Xuan, Vincent Tee Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Giornale Italiano di Endodonzia has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.