Search

Search Results

• Comparison Of Debris Removal Efficiency Of Different Endodontic File Systems

  Yunus Emre Çakmak, Damla Erkal, Ayşegül Doğan, Zeynep Çetin, Oana-Paula Butean, Ana Maria Pistol, Kürşat Er

  24 - 32

  13-06-2025

  https://doi.org/10.32067/GIE.2025.520

  549

  PDF: 241
• 

  Apically extruded debris and irrigants during root canal instrumentation with TruNatomy and ProTaper Gold rotary file systems

  Seda Falakaloglu, Merve Yeniçeri Özata, Emre İriboz

  05-07-2021

  https://doi.org/10.32067/GIE.2021.35.01.29

  4227

  PDF: 975

• Effect of cyclic torsional preloading on cyclic fatigue resistance of ProTaper Next and Mtwo nickel—titanium instruments

  Eugenio Pedullà, Fabio Lo Savio, Gianluca Plotino, Nicola Maria Grande, Silvia Rapisarda, Gianluca Gambarini, Guido La Rosa

  3-8

  https://doi.org/10.32067/gie.2015.29.01.03

  395

  PDF: 199
• 

  Molecular microbiological analysis of ProTaper Next, XP-Endo Shaper and Reciproc Blue systems in severely curved canals

  Wayne M. Nascimento, Mariana Montagner, Danilo L. Campos, João Paulo Drumond, Walber Maeda, Marina C. Prado, Adriana de-Jesus-Soares, Marcos Frozoni

  06-05-2021

  https://doi.org/10.32067/GIE.2021.35.01.15

  755

  PDF: 360

• Shaping ability of several nickel-titanium systems in double-curved simulated canals

  Mothanna Alrahabi

  29-34

  30-06-2017

  https://doi.org/10.32067/gie.2017.31.01.04

  410

  PDF: 320

• Comparison of shaping ability of ProTaper Next and 2Shape nickel—titanium files in simulated severe curved canals

  Simone Staffoli, Taha Ozyurek, Avi Hadad, Alex Lvovsky, Michael Solomonov, Hadas Azizi, Joe Ben Itzhak, Maurizo Bossù, Nicola M. Grande, Gianluca Plotino, Antonella Polimeni

  52-56

  20-02-2019

  https://doi.org/10.32067/gie.2018.32.02.02

  602

  PDF: 303
• 

  Apical debris extrusion and potential risk of endodontic flare-up: correlation with rotating and reciprocating instruments used in daily clinical practice

  Federico Alcide Villani, Fausto Zamparini, Andrea Spinelli, Riccardo Aiuto, Carlo Prati

  05-02-2024

  https://doi.org/10.32067/GIE.2023.37.01.31

  1699

  PDF: 407

• Comparison of effectiveness of Reciproc, Wave One, Protaper, and One Shape rotary instruments in reduction of bacterial load in root canals

  Ali Azizi, Reza Hatam, Parisa Soltani, Shimasadat Miri, Ramin Abiri

  04-06-2020

  https://doi.org/10.32067/GIE.2020.34.01.10

  789

  PDF: 368
• 

  Percentage of Gutta-percha filled area in canals shaped with Nickel-Titanium instruments and obturated with GuttaCore and Conform Fit gutta-percha cones

  Valentina Giuliani, Luca Di Nasso, Debora Franceschi, Andrea Nizzardo, Daniele Scaminaci, Gabriella Pagavino, Riccardo Pace

  06-05-2021

  https://doi.org/10.32067/GIE.2021.35.01.22

  827

  PDF: 396

• Micro-CT evaluation of ProTaper Next and WaveOne Gold shaping in maxillary first molars curved canals: an in vitro study

  Fabio Tutino, Mario Alovisi, Mattia Bernardi, Giorgia Carpegna, Allegra Comba, Damiano Pasqualini, Nicola Scotti, Elio Berutti

  11-06-2019

  https://doi.org/10.32067/gie.2019.33.01.09

  929

  pdf: 731

• Next Generation Workflow for Apical Control in Endodontics: three case report

  Gabriele Ragucci , Giulia Malvicini, Carlo Gaeta, Simone Grandini, Filippo Cardinali, Fabio Gorni

  44 - 52

  15-07-2025

  https://doi.org/10.32067/GIE.2025.514

  779

  PDF: 411
• 

  Comparative evaluation of the effectiveness of different rotary systems in removal of root canal filling materials

  Neda Shekarchizade, Masoume Shahpouri, Mohammadreza Avalin Charsooghi, Gianrico Spagnuolo, Parisa Soltani

  12-04-2022

  https://doi.org/10.32067/GIE.2021.35.02.55

  1597

  PDF: 765
• 

  Comparative analysis of debris extrusion and instrumentation time among various endodontic file systems: an in vitro study Debris Extrusion and Instrumentation Time Analysis

  Carlos Eduardo Fontana, Beatriz dos Santos Ribeiro , Luana de Carvalho Davanso, João Daniel Mendonça de Moura, Daniel Guimarães Pedro Rocha, Rina Andrea Pelegrine, Carlos Eduardo da Silveira Bueno, Sérgio Luiz Pinheiro

  07-11-2024

  https://doi.org/10.32067/GIE.2024.38.01.22

  532

  PDF: 418
• 

  Comparative evaluation of smear layer removal with Ultra-X device and XP-Endo Finisher file system: an ex-vivo study Smear removal on using various activation devices

  Raghavendra Penukonda, Kavalipurapu Venkata Teja, Kranthi Raja Kacharaju, Sia Yin Xuan, Deeviya A/P Mohan, Lau Yi Sheun, Mariangela Cernera, Flavia Iaculli

  13-09-2023

  https://doi.org/10.32067/GIE.2023.37.01.18

  1060

  PDF: 345
• 

  Influence of operator’s experience in three different instrumentation techniques: an in vitro study

  Ilaria La Prova, Isabella Perondi, Stefano Corbella, Roberto Fornara, Silvio Taschieri

  06-05-2021

  https://doi.org/10.32067/GIE.2021.35.01.11

  527

  PDF: 307
• 

  Micro-computed tomography evaluation of filling material removal by three reciprocating systems with different thermal treatments

  Ana Grasiela Limoeiro, Antônio Henrique Braitt, Alessandra Silveira Machado, Carlos Eduardo Bueno, Carlos Eduardo Fontana, Laila Gonzales Freire, Ricardo Tadeu Lopes, Alexandre De Martin

  03-03-2021

  https://doi.org/10.32067/GIE.2021.35.01.07

  898

  PDF: 536
• 

  Investigation on the frequency of streak artifacts resulted from different sealers in cone-beam computed tomography images

  Vida Maserrat, Heshmat Allah Ebrahimi Shahraki, Maryam Dalaei Moghadam, Forough Khodadadnejad, Hananeh Jami Al Ahmadi

  04-10-2021

  https://doi.org/10.32067/GIE.2021.35.02.37

  1863

  PDF: 490

• The impact of kinematics, single-file technique and preparation time on the apical extrusion of debris

  Carlos Eduardo Fontana, Giovana Menegatti Ferraresso, Letícia Pinheiro Derigi, João Daniel Mendonça de Moura, Rina Andrea Pelegrine, Daniel Guimarães Pedro Rocha, Carlos Eduardo da Silveira Bueno, Alexandre Sigrist De Martin, Sérgio Luiz Pinheiro Pinheiro

  26-10-2020

  https://doi.org/10.32067/GIE.2020.34.02.14

  885

  PDF: 619

• Apical preparation size after repetitive pecking to the working length using different endodontic file systems

  Tousif Iqbal Nathani, Aatif Iqbal Nathani, Ankur Mahesh Banode, Moez Ismail Khakiani, Juan Gonzalo Olivieri Fernandez, Fernando Duràn-Sindreu Terol, Francesc Abella Sans

  80-85

  20-02-2019

  https://doi.org/10.32067/gie.2018.32.02.07

  548

  PDF: 277
• 

  Efficacy of passive ultrasonic irrigation in removing residual root filling material during retreatment: an ex vivo analyses by micro-CT and confocal laser scanning microscope

  Carina Michelon, Mariana De Carlo Bello, Pauline Mastella Lang, Rafael Pillar, Carlos Alexandre Souza Bier

  07-06-2024

  https://doi.org/10.32067/GIE.2024.38.01.08

  987

  PDF: 366

• Analysis of dentinal erosion and removing smear layer of different irrigation protocols: an in vitro study

  Riccardo Pace, Luca Di Nasso, Lucia Tauro, Andrea Nizzardo, Gabriella Pagavino, Valentina Giuliani

  26-10-2020

  https://doi.org/10.32067/GIE.2020.34.02.17

  731

  PDF: 469
• 

  Efficacy of XP-endo Finisher-R in enhancing removal of bioceramic sealer from oval root canal: a micro-CT study

  Bassem M. Eid, Heba B. Abdel Maksoud, Tarek M. Elsewify

  11-06-2021

  https://doi.org/10.32067/GIE.2021.35.01.26

  1170

  PDF: 953
• 

  Evaluation of extruded debris by different nickel titanium systems and hand files from apical foramen and simulated root perforation areas Debris extrusion from perforation

  Hatice Harorlı, Alper Kuştarcı

  13-12-2023

  https://doi.org/10.32067/GIE.2023.37.01.29

  1061

  PDF: 344

• Analysis of the ability of XP Clean and easy clean files to remove Calcium Hydroxide paste from simulated internal tooth resorptions

  Sérgio Henrique Staut Brunini, Mariana S. Yamashita, Mayara O. Babolin, Luiz F. Tomazinho

  26-10-2020

  https://doi.org/10.32067/GIE.2020.34.02.09

  743

  PDF: 615